I am displeased. This is your choice, the both of you. I'm gonna paint the town square red, and then wash my hands on Oct13. That's the anniversary of William's death. Understand the symbolism? William protected Mar, and that was my duty. I will renounce this on that day, if we are no more. -Chad
This is going to be the home of my Magnum Opus dedicated to the memory of our potential, and in honour of my spouse's agency, and her mourning the loss of her womanhood and her choice to protect her abuser.
This is my wife's Surrogate Husband David. Fraud vitiates everything. By her non-consensual and uncertified avoidance of the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony Stacy invalidates our whole marriage, when heard before the Marriage Tribunal.
I believe that when two become one, as they do in Communion for the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony, they achieve absolute entanglement, like quantum particles. That means past, present, and future are bestowed by the lover upon the beloved, and vice versa, as a function of Faith.
We're going to be liquidating a large number of our domains to fund our scheduled challenge to the brownshirt army so we can actually pull off this surgical lawfare strike. Please stay tuned as we are selling some slightly hot domains including...
Since your mother died last summer, you've made it ABUNDANTLY CLEAR that you are using me as a part-time back-scratcher and bed-warmer. Also that you see your marriage as an afterthough. Mid-life crisis? See rough timeline below.
First, history shows that unfettered professional discretion undermines a consumer's autonomy, dignity and integrity. Second, without the right to review, other rights are impossible to assert as the human rights- based jurisprudence shows. Finally, in the case of Ontario's legislation, the right to review is the most efficient means to ensure that the rationale for limiting a consumer's rights can be articulated and justified according to objective criteria.